Multidisciplinary Evaluation of the Physician Assistant Role in an American Burn Association-Verified Burn Centre in Canada
Clicks: 6
ID: 324558
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.9
/100
6 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #26 of 70 articles by views in journal of burn care & research : official publication of the american burn association
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Physician assistants are increasingly incorporated into acute care and surgical services, yet their role within specialized burn centres remains incompletely defined. Burn care is particularly resource-intensive, requiring continuity across resuscitation, critical care, surgery, rehabilitation, and longitudinal outpatient follow-up. Workforce pressures, including resident duty-hour restrictions, growing documentation burden, and limited specialist manpower, have heightened interest in durable advanced practice provider models. We conducted a multidisciplinary quality improvement survey at an American Burn Association-verified Canadian burn centre to evaluate staff understanding of the physician assistant role, perceived contributions to patient care and workflow, and priorities for future development. An anonymous 25-question electronic survey was distributed to physicians, trainees, nurses, allied health professionals, and administrative staff. Quantitative responses were summarized descriptively and free-text responses were analyzed thematically. Thirty-two of 63 eligible staff members responded (50.8%). Most interacted with the physician assistant daily or several times daily. Eighty-four percent supported continued employment, 50% supported hiring additional physician assistants, and 41% supported role expansion. Respondents perceived positive effects on continuity, physician workload, procedural availability, multidisciplinary efficiency, documentation, and mitigation of staffing gaps. Only 34% reported full awareness of the formal scope of practice, and overlap with residents and fellows was frequently identified. Free-text responses similarly emphasized continuity, accessibility, and procedural support, while calling for clearer role delineation and additional critical care training. These findings describe strong multidisciplinary support for the physician assistant role while identifying role clarity, structured competency development, and objective prospective evaluation as priorities for the next phase of implementation.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7202139196
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Kristine Laing, Ashley Callahan, Dee Naidu, Stephanie Mason, David K. Wallace, H. Rode |
| Journal | journal of burn care & research : official publication of the american burn association |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jbcr/irag138
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.