Role of antiseizure medication in postoperative late seizure and survival among patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a multicenter retrospective study

Clicks: 1
ID: 324142
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background We conducted a multicenter study to investigate the utility of postoperative antiseizure medication (ASM) in the occurrence of late seizure in glioblastoma. In addition, we analyzed whether postoperative ASM affects survival. Methods 1,132 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma at 39 centers were enrolled. In patients treated with postoperative ASM (levetiracetam [LEV], lacosamide [LCM], or perampanel [PER]), as well as in those who received no medication, the cumulative incidence of late seizure, adverse events, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Results In total, 1,099 patients (female: 482, male: 617, mean age: 67.2 years) were included, among whom, 287 developed postoperative late seizure. The mean onset time of late seizure was 193.6 days after surgery. Postoperative ASMs were administered in 628 cases, LEV in 344, LCM in 124, and PER in 160. The cumulative incidence of late seizure at 12 months was as follows: no medication in 30.9%, LEV in 17.8%, LCM in 28.8%, and PER in 16.2%. Multivariable analysis disclosed that LEV and PER displayed significantly lower cumulative incidences of postoperative late seizure compared with no medication and LCM. By contrast, median progression-free survival/overall survival did not significantly differ among ASMs. However, during the 12-24 month interval, the PER group demonstrated a more favorable prognosis than the other groups. Conclusions LEV and PER after glioblastoma surgery were associated with a reduced risk of late seizure compared with LCM or no medication. LEV or PER may be considered as postoperative ASMs to optimize seizure control and potentially help preserve patients’ QOL.
Reference Key
openalex_W7201856820 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Akihiro Inoue, Makoto Ohno, Yawara Nakamura, Yoshitaka Narita, Daisuke Kawauchi, Yoshiteru Shimoda, Mitsuto Hanihara, Tomoo Matsutani, Shigeo Ohba, Natsumi Yamashita, Narushi Sugii, Kuniaki Saito, Ichiyo Shibahara, Shunsaku Takayanagi, Joji Ishida, Masamichi Takahashi, Noriyuki Kijima, Yuta Mitobe, Nayuta Higa, Masato Saito, Ryosuke Matsuda, Yukitomo Ishi, Kohei Nakajima, Shinji Yamashita, Kaoru Tamura, Iori Ozono, Taiki Setoguchi, Tetsuya Negoto, Kosuke Katayama, Atsushi Kambe, Daisuke Kuga, Kazuhiro Tanaka, Takeshi Okuda, Koichiro Sumi, Takahiro Kanda, Shigeki Takada, Kojiro Wada, Yu Fujii, Yu Kawanishi, Hideyuki Arita, Yuichi Sato, Takuya Yonemochi, Ryohei Otani, Shinichiro Koizumi, Yoshiki Arakawa, Takeharu Kunieda
Journal Neuro-Oncology Advances
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/noajnl/vdag205
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.