Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting or durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents in high bleeding-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome: the BIOFLOW-DAPT randomized trial
Clicks: 15
ID: 323847
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
4.2
/100
15 views
12 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #15 of 28 articles by views in European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Aims Patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at high risk of adverse outcomes. We investigated the clinical outcomes and their consistency after biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting (BP-SES) or durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent (DP-ZES) implantation in HBR patients with or without ACS. Methods and results The per-protocol population of the BIOFLOW-DAPT randomized control trial (RCT) consisted of HBR patients with (n = 541) or without ACS (n = 1245) who were randomized to BP-SES or DP-ZES and underwent 1 month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite endpoint of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cd-TLR) as well as major bleeding defined as BARC 3 or 5 (according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification) and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST). At 1 year, patients with ACS suffered from higher cardiac death rates (3.4 vs. 1.3%, log-rank P = 0.004) but similar TLF (6.8 vs. 6.7%, P = 0.992), TV-MI (2.8 vs. 4.5%, P = 0.100), cd-TLR (1.4 vs. 2.1%, P = 0.300), major bleeding (4.2 vs. 3.1%, P = 0.266), and ST (0.2 vs. 0.9%, P = 0.098) compared with no ACS patients. The rate of TLF and of all secondary endpoints was consistent with BP-SES or DP-ZES across ACS strata. Conclusion HBR patients with ACS are at higher risk of cardiac death than those without ACS and experience a consistent outcome with BP-SES or DP-ZES followed by 1 month DAPT at 1 year follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04137510.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7172500714
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Nader Mankerious, Rayyan Hemetsberger, Adrian Włodarczak, B Merkely, Henning Kelbæk, Guillaume Cayla, Jacek Legutko, Stefano Galli, Matthieu Godin, Gabor G Toth, Thibault Lhermusier, Mohammed Saad, Benjamin Honton, Francesca Sanguineti, Peter Laurenz Dietrich, Derk Frank, Francis Stammen, Bert Ferdinande, Johanne Silvain, Davide Capodanno, Holger Nef, Gert Richardt, Ralph Toelg, Marco Valgimigli |
| Journal | European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/ehjacc/zuag089
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.