Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting or durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents in high bleeding-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome: the BIOFLOW-DAPT randomized trial

Clicks: 15
ID: 323847
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #15 of 28 articles by views in European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Aims Patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at high risk of adverse outcomes. We investigated the clinical outcomes and their consistency after biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting (BP-SES) or durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent (DP-ZES) implantation in HBR patients with or without ACS. Methods and results The per-protocol population of the BIOFLOW-DAPT randomized control trial (RCT) consisted of HBR patients with (n = 541) or without ACS (n = 1245) who were randomized to BP-SES or DP-ZES and underwent 1 month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite endpoint of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cd-TLR) as well as major bleeding defined as BARC 3 or 5 (according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification) and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST). At 1 year, patients with ACS suffered from higher cardiac death rates (3.4 vs. 1.3%, log-rank P = 0.004) but similar TLF (6.8 vs. 6.7%, P = 0.992), TV-MI (2.8 vs. 4.5%, P = 0.100), cd-TLR (1.4 vs. 2.1%, P = 0.300), major bleeding (4.2 vs. 3.1%, P = 0.266), and ST (0.2 vs. 0.9%, P = 0.098) compared with no ACS patients. The rate of TLF and of all secondary endpoints was consistent with BP-SES or DP-ZES across ACS strata. Conclusion HBR patients with ACS are at higher risk of cardiac death than those without ACS and experience a consistent outcome with BP-SES or DP-ZES followed by 1 month DAPT at 1 year follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04137510.
Reference Key
openalex_W7172500714 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Nader Mankerious, Rayyan Hemetsberger, Adrian Włodarczak, B Merkely, Henning Kelbæk, Guillaume Cayla, Jacek Legutko, Stefano Galli, Matthieu Godin, Gabor G Toth, Thibault Lhermusier, Mohammed Saad, Benjamin Honton, Francesca Sanguineti, Peter Laurenz Dietrich, Derk Frank, Francis Stammen, Bert Ferdinande, Johanne Silvain, Davide Capodanno, Holger Nef, Gert Richardt, Ralph Toelg, Marco Valgimigli
Journal European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ehjacc/zuag089
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.