Acquired macular dermal hyperpigmentation: assessment and management
Clicks: 6
ID: 323451
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
6 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #29 of 169 articles by views in clinical and experimental dermatology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 169 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We suggest two practical refinements to Narayan et al.'s review of ADMH: that photoprotection advice should explicitly target UVA1 and visible light with a tinted, iron-oxide sunscreen in skin of colour, and that the inexpensive, widely available Wood's lamp deserves recognition for distinguishing treatable epidermal from dermal pigment. Together these enhance diagnosis and management, particularly in skin-of-colour and resource-limited settings.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7172319052
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Amr Tahoun, Faisal R. Ali |
| Journal | clinical and experimental dermatology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/ced/llag351
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.