Managing Chaperone Refusal in Intimate Dermatological Examinations
Clicks: 7
ID: 323428
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
1.8
/100
7 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #39 of 176 articles by views in clinical and experimental dermatology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 176 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We present an ethical dilemma involving a competent patient requiring an intimate dermatological examination who requests to proceed without a chaperone. We explore the key ethical considerations, including autonomy, dignity, and professional accountability, and outline an appropriate, patient-centred approach to management.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7172248840
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Neil P Patel, Ashley Spencer |
| Journal | clinical and experimental dermatology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/ced/llag348
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.