Seasonal patterns of coastal waterbird habitat use differ between floating and submerged oyster farms

Clicks: 12
ID: 323185
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #11 of 21 articles by views in Ornithological Applications

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Oyster aquaculture is expanding rapidly in coastal ecosystems, introducing novel structures and human activity into habitats used by waterbird communities. However, few studies have evaluated how gear types and aquaculture operations influence waterbird presence, abundance, and behavior across seasons. We examined species- and guild-level responses of 31 coastal waterbird species to floating and submerged oyster gear and aquaculture-related disturbance across 47 estuarine sites in Rhode Island, USA, from 2020–2023. Floating gear arrays created elevated roosting platforms that were used by gulls (Larus spp.), terns (Sterna spp.), and cormorants (Nannopterum spp.) during post-breeding staging (4–15× higher odds of occurrence) and supported winter foraging for some diving species, while reducing Mareca americana (American Wigeon) abundance by ∼ 10-fold. In contrast, submerged gear reduced presence or abundance of geese (Branta and Anser spp.) and dabbling ducks (primarily Anas spp.), likely reflecting shading or obstruction of submerged vegetation and benthic foraging areas. Shorebirds and wading birds generally exhibited largely neutral responses, with notable exceptions: Ardea alba (Great Egret) and A. herodias (Great Blue Heron) were more likely to occur near floating gear but less likely near submerged gear, while Tringa semipalmata (Willet) showed reduced presence near submerged gear. Aquaculture-related disturbance had mixed effects: some waterfowl and cormorants were attracted to active farm operations, whereas Anas rubripes (American Black Duck) and T. semipalmata showed significant avoidance. Overall, the effects of oyster aquaculture on waterbirds are context dependent and mediated by gear type, siting, season, and species ecology. Floating gear often provides incidental habitat benefits, whereas submerged gear commonly constrains use by species dependent on shallow vegetation and benthic prey. Management strategies that avoid vegetated shallows, elevate or cluster gear, and align farm operations with sensitive periods can reduce conflicts, while maintaining meaningful habitat value for waterbirds.
Reference Key
openalex_W7172118285 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Martina S. Müller, Peter W. C. Paton, Jennifer E. Kilburn, Scott R. McWilliams
Journal Ornithological Applications
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ornithapp/duag069
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.