Crisis as Catalyst: The future of the NIH driving scientific discovery
Clicks: 5
ID: 323177
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
5 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #243 of 430 articles by views in The Journal of infectious diseases
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 430 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has an unparalleled record of advancing biomedical science. Today, two critical challenges threaten its future impact. We propose concrete steps to restore the NIH's trajectory and preserve its leadership in scientific discovery.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7171977381
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ana A. Weil, Sarah M. Baker, Frederick S. Buckner, Geoffrey S. Gottlieb, Kevin Hybiske, David M. Koelle, Tara B. Reid, Michelle C. Sabo, Chetan Seshadri, Javeed A. Shah, Wesley C. Van Voorhis, Helen Y. Chu |
| Journal | The Journal of infectious diseases |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/infdis/jiag397
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.