Bias in Estimating Subcritical Reproduction Numbers Under Imperfect Observation and Overlapping Transmission Chains: Theoretical Framework and Application to Mpox
Clicks: 7
ID: 323165
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
7 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #48 of 304 articles by views in american journal of epidemiology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 304 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Estimating transmission potential and risk factors for emerging infections often relies on incomplete surveillance data. When infections are missed or their sources are misclassified, estimates of the effective reproduction number (Rs) and associations between case attributes and infection source may be biased. We developed an analytic framework to quantify and correct these biases, treating imperfect observation and entanglement of transmission chains as forms of misclassification that distort estimates of transmission parameters. The bias depends on the probability of case observation (Pobs) and the extent of concurrent introductions (Rp). We illustrate this framework using surveillance data for mpox in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (1981-1986, 2013-2017), showing that incomplete observation leads to underestimation of Rs, whereas overlapping introductions can cause overestimation. Both types of bias also attenuate odds ratios for traits that distinguish primary (spillover) from secondary (human-tohuman) infections. Accounting for these biases provides context for the global emergence of mpox in 2022 and for how current transmission patterns differ from historical trends. These results demonstrate how standard epidemiologic concepts of misclassification and missingness can clarify bias in transmission studies and improve interpretation of surveillance data for emerging pathogens, including zoonoses and vaccine-preventable infections.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7171979703
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Seth Blumberg, Santiago D. Cárdenas, Andrew W Liu, Taye Samuel Faniran, Juliet R.C. Pulliam, James O. Lloyd‐Smith |
| Journal | american journal of epidemiology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/aje/kwag185
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.