Medicaid Payment Policies for Methadone Maintenance Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder, 2020-2025
Clicks: 1
ID: 323137
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #76 of 89 articles by views in Health Affairs Scholar
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background The potential of Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) to address the opioid crisis has been limited by restrictive federal and local policies that required frequent clinic visits for medication. Unprecedented federal regulatory changes started in early COVID-19 and were made permanent in 2024, and allow clinics increased flexibility in granting take-home medication to patients. Medicaid payment policies can profoundly shape provider behaviors but may not align with regulatory changes. Methods We conducted a systematic synthesis of Medicaid MMT payment and billing policies among 40 states over 3/2020-7/2025. Results More than half of the states continued to adopt a per-dose or per-diem approach to paying for methadone dosing and a per-service approach to paying for addiction counseling, thus tying Medicaid revenue closely to clinic visits. More than one-quarter maintained a flat bundled payment dating back to pre-pandemic era that provided little incentive for granting patients more than one week of take-home medication. Adoption of a two-tiered bundled payment modeled after Medicare’s payment increased over time but remained limited. Conclusion Medicaid payment policies for MMT saw limited changes over the 5 years following initial federal regulatory changes. Practice changes towards more flexible and patient-centered care may be hindered without compatible changes in payment approaches.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7171934874
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Yuhua Bao, Promi Chakraborty, Kayla Hutchings, Shashi N. Kapadia, Noa Krawczyk, Bruce R. Schackman, Barbara Andraka‐Christou, Ju‐Chen Hu |
| Journal | Health Affairs Scholar |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/haschl/qxag195
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.