Explainable Electrocardiogram Interpretation using Deep Learning-based Semantic Segmentation

Clicks: 1
ID: 323118
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #42 of 55 articles by views in European Heart Journal - Digital Health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Accurate electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform delineation, rhythm classification, and median beat generation are interdependent steps whose joint modeling improves consistency for downstream computerized diagnostic tasks. This study aimed to develop a lead-agnostic segmentation model that performs these tasks by segmenting individual leads and aggregating predictions in postprocessing. Methods A DeepLabV3-based neural network was trained to segment ECG leads into 20 waveform and rhythm classes using 1,931 annotated ECGs and 33,093 ECGs with physician-verified diagnostic statements. Postprocessing combined lead-wise predictions to delineate intervals, classify rhythm, and construct median beats. Performance was evaluated on internal (n = 988) and external (n = 1,303) test sets. Median beats were compared with PTB-XL + reference medians from Marquette 12SL and University of Glasgow (Uni-G) using similarity metrics and downstream classification. An interactive web tool (http://segmentation.ecgx.ai) was released to support further research. Results In the external set, delineation for PQ-interval, QRS-duration, and QT-interval had mean errors of -0.9 ± 10.4 ms, 0.2 ± 7.4 ms, and 1.8 ± 16.0 ms. Rhythm classification was performed by assigning class labels to segmented waveform components, with weighted F1 scores of 0.94 for P waves and 0.89 for QRS complexes. Qualitative review showed good alignment with reference beats and differences in beat selection, adjacent beat handling, and QRS identification. Downstream classification performance was equivalent to Marquette 12SL medians but statistically superior to Uni-G medians for 7/10 diagnostic labels. Conclusions This study demonstrates a robust, clinically applicable, vendor- and lead-agnostic deep learning model for ECG analysis, encompassing waveform delineation, rhythm classification, and median beat construction.
Reference Key
openalex_W7171919946 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Bauke Arends, Bas B.S. Schots, Parmenion Koutsogeorgos, Timo Nijkamp, Tim M Paquaij, Diantha J. M. Schipaanboord, Rutger J. Hassink, Pim van der Harst, René van Es, Rutger R van de Leur
Journal European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ehjdh/ztag122
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztag122
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.