Are Critics More Credible? When Positivity Is Expected, Negative Reviewers Are Perceived to Be Less Credible
Clicks: 4
ID: 323117
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.9
/100
4 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #22 of 194 articles by views in journal of consumer research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 194 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract When writing a review, influencers market their credibility–a critical antecedent to consumers’ attitudes towards reviewers, reviews, and brands. This research examines how consumer reviews shape source credibility and subsequent word-of-mouth (WOM) of influencers. Nineteen studies (N = 7,330), across several product categories and situations, find that consumers perceive negative reviewers as less credible than positive reviewers due to an expectancy-violation of social norms: negativity violates prior expectations for positive reviews. Study 1 finds that while a negative review is viewed as more helpful, the reviewer is perceived as less credible. Studies 2-5 test the expectancy-violation account, finding that the effect on credibility is mediated by social norms (study 2), is mitigated when consumers have ambiguous prior expectations, and reverses when expectations are negative (studies 3-5). Studies 7A-7I replicate this effect across many domains. This reduction in source credibility has downstream consequences, decreasing consumers’ willingness to follow a subsequent recommendation and the source on social media (studies 6A and 6B). While criticism may be intended to damage a brand and/or to help other consumers, this research finds that criticism hinders WOM and the credibility of a reviewer/influencer. Thus, critics are less credible, and have less influence, when positivity is expected.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7172001493
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Junha Kim, Joseph K. Goodman |
| Journal | journal of consumer research |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jcr/ucag025
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.