Are Critics More Credible? When Positivity Is Expected, Negative Reviewers Are Perceived to Be Less Credible

Clicks: 55
ID: 323117
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #32 of 204 articles by views in journal of consumer research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 204 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract When writing a review, influencers market their credibility–a critical antecedent to consumers’ attitudes towards reviewers, reviews, and brands. This research examines how consumer reviews shape source credibility and subsequent word-of-mouth (WOM) of influencers. Nineteen studies (N = 7,330), across several product categories and situations, find that consumers perceive negative reviewers as less credible than positive reviewers due to an expectancy-violation of social norms: negativity violates prior expectations for positive reviews. Study 1 finds that while a negative review is viewed as more helpful, the reviewer is perceived as less credible. Studies 2-5 test the expectancy-violation account, finding that the effect on credibility is mediated by social norms (study 2), is mitigated when consumers have ambiguous prior expectations, and reverses when expectations are negative (studies 3-5). Studies 7A-7I replicate this effect across many domains. This reduction in source credibility has downstream consequences, decreasing consumers’ willingness to follow a subsequent recommendation and the source on social media (studies 6A and 6B). While criticism may be intended to damage a brand and/or to help other consumers, this research finds that criticism hinders WOM and the credibility of a reviewer/influencer. Thus, critics are less credible, and have less influence, when positivity is expected.
Reference Key
openalex_W7172001493 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Junha Kim, Joseph K. Goodman
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal journal of consumer research
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jcr/ucag025
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucag025
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.