AUSTRIA: cross-country comparison of private foundations
Clicks: 1
ID: 322941
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #4 of 6 articles by views in Trusts & Trustees
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The following article provides a comparison of the legal and tax framework of private foundations in Austria, Switzerland, and Liechtenstein. It provides an overview of key aspects, including taxation, reporting, auditing, taxation of beneficiaries, and the framework on directors. By outlining the relevant differences between the Austrian, Swiss and Liechtenstein private-foundation regimes, the article supports practitioners and high-net-worth individuals in selecting a suitable location for the private foundation and offers insights for strategic asset planning.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7171845246
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sibylle Novak, David Hürlimann, Roger Quaderer |
| Journal | Trusts & Trustees |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/tandt/ttag047
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.