Serious fungal diseases: Assessing the impact of training clinicians and laboratory scientists in Nigeria

Clicks: 6
ID: 322916
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #84 of 214 articles by views in Open forum infectious diseases

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 214 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Surveillance for serious fungal diseases (SFDs) relies on the capacity to recognize, request and accurately perform diagnostic investigations. However, knowledge in resource-limited settings is sub-optimal. This study evaluated the impact of a training intervention on the diagnosis and management of SFDs amongst clinicians and laboratory scientists in Nigerian tertiary hospitals. Methods Clinicians in six hospitals were purposively selected and trained on six SFDs using standardized modules developed by international medical mycology experts. A quasi-experimental design assessed performance using a pretest and posttest. Designated laboratory scientists received hands-on training with pre- and post-training assessments. Paired t-test assessed differences in mean scores. Impact assessment of the laboratory mycology records was performed one-year post-intervention using ANOVA. Results A total of 149 clinicians and eight laboratory scientists participated. Mean performance scores of participants improved significantly after training, with the following percentage increases: invasive aspergillosis (25.4%, p < 0.001), chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (13.0%, p < 0.001), invasive candidiasis (23.8%, p < 0.001), Pneumocystis pneumonia (22.6%, p < 0.001), mucormycosis (29.5%, p < 0.001) and histoplasmosis (20.6%, p < 0.001). There was also a significant improvement in the laboratory scientists’ post training performance (59.1%, p < 0.001). The laboratory mycology records reviewed one year later indicated a significant increase in the number of samples sent to the laboratory for mycologic testing (p < 0.001) and number and distribution of fungal isolates identified (p < 0.001). Conclusion Training significantly improved SFD diagnosis, enhanced surveillance and patient care. Expanding this model across other low-resource settings is recommended.
Reference Key
openalex_W7171698896 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Rita Oladele, Damilola Akinlawon, Alexander Jordan, Iriagbonse I. Osaigbovo, Olufunmilola Makanjuola, Ubong Udoh, Philip I. P. Princewill-Nwajiobi, Yahaya Mohammed, Folake Peters, Tochi Okwor, Akin Osibogun, Folasade Ogunsola, Martin Hoenigl, Jean‐Pierre Gangneux, Shawn R. Lockhart, Tom Chiller, Nancy Chow
Journal Open forum infectious diseases
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ofid/ofag442
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.