Cultural and ethical dimensions of anthropomorphizing technology in Africa

Clicks: 7
ID: 322764
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #12 of 18 articles by views in digital scholarship in the humanities

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This article examines how anthropomorphism, the attribution of human characteristics to non-human systems, acquires distinctive cultural, ethical, and technological significance in African societies, and develops a relational framework for understanding human–machine interaction that challenges prevailing Western narratives. The study adopts a critical interpretivist, narrative–synthesis approach, drawing on African philosophy, science and technology studies, artificial intelligence (AI) ethics, cultural anthropology, and posthumanism to construct an interpretive account of how technologies are domesticated, reinterpreted, and morally evaluated within African cosmologies. African anthropomorphism is rooted in traditions such as animism, totemism, oral storytelling, and communal ethics, and embodies a relational ontology in which personhood and agency are shared among human and non-human actors. Robots, AI systems, and Information and Communication Technologies are variously interpreted as moral subjects, children-in-training, or spiritually charged instruments, with notable regional variation across West, East, and Southern Africa. The article synthesizes a fragmented body of African scholarship on technology, animism, and relational ethics into a single, sustained framework for anthropomorphism, treating African cosmologies as a primary analytical lens rather than a comparative aside to Euro-American theory. The article contributes to a pluralistic understanding of technology ethics and offers a framework relevant to the design, governance, and study of AI and robotics in culturally diverse settings. This is done by foregrounding African relational epistemologies in debates on human–machine interaction.
Reference Key
openalex_W7171497575 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Tosin Sina Akerele, Sakinat Oluwabukonla Folorunso, Akíndélé Àkànjí Àìná
Journal digital scholarship in the humanities
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/llc/fqag105
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.