What’s in a Debt? Rating Agency Methodologies and Firms’ Financing and Investment Decisions

Clicks: 2
ID: 322741
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #10 of 10 articles by views in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract In July 2013, Moody’s unexpectedly increased the amount of equity credit speculative-grade firms receive for preferred stock from 50% to 100%. Firms affected by the rule change were suddenly considered less levered by Moody’s, even though their balance sheets did not change. These firms responded by issuing debt to restore the original leverage ratio as defined by Moody’s and growing their assets. The rule change transferred value from debt to equity holders and led to an increase in preferred stock issuance. How rating agencies assess risk thus has a significant causal impact on firms’ financing, investment, and security design decisions. (JEL G24, G32)
Reference Key
openalex_W7171613397 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Cesare Fracassi, Gregory Weitzner
Journal The Review of Corporate Finance Studies
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/rcfs/cfag026
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.