Global perceptions on social work: A scoping review

Clicks: 4
ID: 322504
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #15 of 18 articles by views in The British Journal of Social Work

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Public perceptions of social work shape trust, legitimacy and the profession’s capacity to advocate for social justice, yet these perceptions remain poorly understood across global contexts. This scoping review synthesises 32 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and October 2025 to examine (1) how social workers believe they are perceived, (2) public views on social work, and (3) perspectives of professionals and stakeholders, including media and clients. Guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, studies were analysed thematically. Five recurring themes were identified: (1) media influence, (2) public knowledge gaps, (3) trust, (4) social workers’ perceptions of public views, and (5) strategies for shaping perceptions. Despite wide variation in practice contexts, the review found global similarities across these themes, with contextual factors shaping nuance rather than fundamentally different patterns of perception. Public perceptions were shaped by historical and ideological forces as much as by individual encounters with social workers. The findings highlight the need for internationally relevant strategies to strengthen professional visibility and legitimacy. Improving understanding and trust requires increased public engagement alongside critical reflection within the profession, ensuring social workers are recognised as knowledgeable advocates who address structural inequities while supporting individuals, families and communities.
Reference Key
openalex_W7171066253 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Corina Modderman, Ulene Schiller, Barbara Staniforth, Margo Trappenburg, Helen Hickson, Natasha Long
Journal The British Journal of Social Work
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjsw/bcag131
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.