Consumers Undervalue Multi-Option Alternatives

Clicks: 7
ID: 322466
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #17 of 197 articles by views in journal of consumer research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 197 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Initial choices often lead to downstream choices. Initial choices among restaurants lead to downstream choices among entrées, and initial choices among resorts lead to downstream choices among activities. How do the options available for downstream choices (e.g., entrées, activities) affect initial choices among multi-option alternatives (e.g., restaurants, resorts)? Forward-looking consumers should be able to identify their most-preferred downstream choice options (e.g., favorite entrée, favorite activity) and select an initial alternative accordingly. Less-preferred downstream choice options may therefore be disregarded. Yet fifteen studies across four domains (three consumer goods and risky gambles) indicate this is not how consumers choose. Instead, adding a less-preferred option to an otherwise-attractive set of downstream choice options decreases the choice share of the corresponding multi-option alternative. The effect size increases as the difference in value between the more-preferred and less-preferred options increases. Mouse-tracking reveals that participants who attend more to a less-preferred downstream choice option (e.g., entrée, activity) are less likely to choose the corresponding multi-option alternative (e.g., restaurant, resort). A manipulation of attention to the downstream choice options provides causal evidence for this mechanism. This work enhances our understanding of multi-option decision-making and how decision-makers assess the overall value of choice sets.
Reference Key
openalex_W4406636336 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Stephanie R. Rainey‐Smith, Stephen A. Spiller
Journal journal of consumer research
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jcr/ucag024
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucag024
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.