Thiazolidinedione use and risk of bacterial enteric infection among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Clicks: 34
ID: 322339
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #56 of 318 articles by views in Open forum infectious diseases

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 318 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Thiazolidinediones are peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) agonists commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. In experimental models, epithelial PPAR-γ signaling contributes to colonization resistance against bacterial enteric pathogens by shaping oxygen and nitrate luminal bioavailability. Whether use of PPAR-γ agonists in humans is associate[ABS]d with reduced risk of bacterial enteric infection is unknown. Methods To investigate whether users of thiazolidinediones (PPAR-γ agonists) have decreased risk of bacterial enteric infection, we performed a retrospective nationwide analysis with the cloud-based TriNetX Analytics Platform which aggregates health records from 117 million patients across 66 US healthcare organizations, to assess the risk of bacterial enteric infection among diabetic patients prescribed thiazolidinediones, a class of PPAR-γ agonists, compared with other anti-diabetes medications. Results Among 85,916 thiazolidinedione users categorized as low-risk for bacterial enteric infection (no prior history of infection) and 1,974 persons identified as high-risk (prior history of bacterial enteric infection), the likelihood of bacterial enteric infection was reduced by 49% (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.82) and 22% (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69-0.88) respectively, compared to users of other anti-diabetes medications. This reduction in risk was consistent across high-risk individuals, regardless of sex or age. Similar results were replicated in high-risk patients when thiazolidinedione users were directly compared to those on DPP-4 inhibitors. Conclusion These findings demonstrate an association between PPAR-γ agonist use and reduced risk of bacterial enteric infection and support further clinical investigation.
Reference Key
openalex_W7170142751 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Open forum infectious diseases
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ofid/ofag457
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.