Bootstrap Approach To Compare the Slopes of Two Calibrations When Few Standards Are Available.

Clicks: 317
ID: 3223
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #31 of 194 articles by views in Analytical chemistry

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 194 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Comparing the slopes of aqueous-based and standard addition calibration procedures is almost a daily task in analytical laboratories. As usual protocols imply very few standards, sound statistical inference and conclusions are hard to obtain for current classical tests (e.g., the t-test), which may greatly affect decision-making. Thus, there is a need for robust statistics that are not distorted by small samples of experimental values obtained from analytical studies. Several promising alternatives based on bootstrapping are studied in this paper under the typical constraints common in laboratory work. The impact of number of standards, homoscedasticity or heteroscedasticity, three variance patterns, and three error distributions on least-squares fits were considered (in total, 144 simulation scenarios). The Student's t-test is the most valuable procedure when the normality assumption is true and homoscedasticity is present, although it can be highly affected by outliers. A wild bootstrap method leads to average rejection percentages that are closer to the nominal level in almost every situation, and it is recommended for laboratories working with a small number of standards. Finally, it was seen that the Theil-Sen percentile bootstrap statistic is very robust but its rejection percentages depart from the nominal ones (<5%), so its use is not recommended when the number of standards is very small. Finally, a tutorial and free software are given to encourage analytical laboratories to apply bootstrap principles to compare the slopes of two calibration lines.
Reference Key
estvezprez2016bootstrapanalytical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Estévez-Pérez, Graciela;Andrade, Jose M;Wilcox, Rand R;
Journal Analytical chemistry
Year 2016
DOI
10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04004
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.