Technology-facilitated client violence in Finnish social services: A street-level bureaucracy perspective
Clicks: 9
ID: 322295
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
9 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #7 of 18 articles by views in The British Journal of Social Work
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Client violence remains a challenge in social services, yet the implications of digitalization for violence have received limited scholarly attention. Drawing on street-level bureaucracy and insights from a public service ecosystem perspective, this study examines how technology-facilitated client violence (TFCV) emerges in everyday street-level discretionary work and how professional discretion is shaped in situations involving TFCV. The analysis draws on qualitative data consisting of open-ended survey responses from street-level professionals (n = 135) and interviews with social care managers (n = 18) in Finland. The findings identify four inter-related empirical dimensions through which TFCV takes form in everyday street-level work—intrusive and on-going contact, public professional discrediting, intimidation and coercion, and technology-facilitated personal harm. These dynamics shape discretionary practice by reconfiguring the temporal organization of work, challenging professional authority and legitimacy, exerting moral and coercive pressure on decision-making, and blurring the boundaries between professional and private life. The reshaping of professional discretion across micro-, meso-, and macro-level conditions is examined. The findings highlight TFCV as a new form of external control shaping discretionary practice and underscore the need for organizational and regulatory responses that safeguard street-level work while preserving clients’ legitimate rights.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7170694391
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sisko Piippo, Anniina Kaittila, Leo Nyqvist |
| Journal | The British Journal of Social Work |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/bjsw/bcag130
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.