Technology-facilitated client violence in Finnish social services: A street-level bureaucracy perspective

Clicks: 46
ID: 322295
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #10 of 36 articles by views in The British Journal of Social Work

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Client violence remains a challenge in social services, yet the implications of digitalization for violence have received limited scholarly attention. Drawing on street-level bureaucracy and insights from a public service ecosystem perspective, this study examines how technology-facilitated client violence (TFCV) emerges in everyday street-level discretionary work and how professional discretion is shaped in situations involving TFCV. The analysis draws on qualitative data consisting of open-ended survey responses from street-level professionals (n = 135) and interviews with social care managers (n = 18) in Finland. The findings identify four inter-related empirical dimensions through which TFCV takes form in everyday street-level work—intrusive and on-going contact, public professional discrediting, intimidation and coercion, and technology-facilitated personal harm. These dynamics shape discretionary practice by reconfiguring the temporal organization of work, challenging professional authority and legitimacy, exerting moral and coercive pressure on decision-making, and blurring the boundaries between professional and private life. The reshaping of professional discretion across micro-, meso-, and macro-level conditions is examined. The findings highlight TFCV as a new form of external control shaping discretionary practice and underscore the need for organizational and regulatory responses that safeguard street-level work while preserving clients’ legitimate rights.
Reference Key
openalex_W7170694391 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sisko Piippo, Anniina Kaittila, Leo Nyqvist
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal The British Journal of Social Work
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjsw/bcag130
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcag130
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.