“Doc, Is This Normal?” A Retrospective Review of Patient Portal Messaging for a Single Surgeon in an Academic Plastic Surgery Practice

Clicks: 6
ID: 322278
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #7 of 81 articles by views in Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Goals/Purpose Secure messaging increases patient engagement but adds to physician workload and burnout. Plastic surgeons face heightened pressure to maintain responsiveness and satisfaction due to online ratings. This study examines EMR messaging trends to optimize discharge and preoperative information to reduce message volume and improve patient-provider communication while supporting physician well-being in a highly scrutinized field. Methods/Technique A single-institution, IRB-approved retrospective review was conducted of patient messages directed to a single academic plastic surgeon at Duke University Hospital over a span of 18 months from July 1, 2023, through December 31, 2024. Patient demographics, message topics, and the date/time of each message were extracted via chart review then securely stored in a REDCap database for subsequent analysis. Methods/Technique A single-institution, IRB-approved retrospective review was conducted of patient messages directed to a single academic plastic surgeon at Duke University Hospital over a span of 18 months from July 1, 2023, through December 31, 2024. Patient demographics, message topics, and the date/time of each message were extracted via chart review then securely stored in a REDCap database for subsequent analysis. Results/Complications Of the 403 patient-initiated EMR messages, most were from women (343) aged 30–50 (171). Over half (213) were preoperative and related to aesthetic body procedures (154). Medical questions with and without photos were the most frequently asked questions. Message frequency peaked on weekdays during work hours. Conclusion This review of patient-initiated messages to an academic plastic surgeon over a continuous 18- month period indicates that digital communication has become a significant component of clinical workflow with most inquiries from middle-aged female patients seeking aesthetic procedures, often preoperatively and during already busy work hours. Optimizing patient education, triage protocols, and institutional support (via office staff, RN;s, and PA’s/NP’s) in the preoperative period can reduce unnecessary queries, improving communication efficiency while balancing patient needs with physician well-being.
Reference Key
openalex_W7170738223 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jessica Berns, Justin L Anderson, Detlev Erdmann
Journal Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/asjof/ojag138.001
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojag138.001
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.