The diversity pendulum: predictors of DEI shifts in corporate America
Clicks: 3
ID: 322268
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #23 of 25 articles by views in soviet social problems
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Between 2020 and 2025, United States companies demonstrated unprecedented swings in their commitments to DEI. This manuscript addresses predictors of why some firms sustain their commitments to DEI while others retreat in the face of sustained political backlash. Drawing on institutional theory, we test the predictive power of three mechanisms to explain firms’ reactions to political and social attacks on DEI practices: coercive pressures (state laws), mimetic pressures (industry leaders), and normative pressures (racial and gender compositions of CEOs and boards). Two author-constructed datasets were developed. The first dataset contained DEI communications within annual shareholder letters for S&P 500 firms. The second was a proprietary dataset with supplemental data that tracked firms’ public-facing practices, policies, and commitments to DEI. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found that the passage of anti-DEI laws in states where firms were headquartered (i.e., coercive pressure) contributed to sustained firm commitment to DEI rather than retreat. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found that the presence of historically underrepresented leaders on companies’ boards (i.e., normative pressure) positively related to sustained commitment to DEI. We did not find support for the influence of industry leaders (mimetic pressure), nor of CEO gender or race, on firms’ DEI-related actions.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7170602575
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Lisa A. Marchiondo, Alicia R. Ingersoll, Christy Glass, Alison Cook |
| Journal | soviet social problems |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/socpro/spag047
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.