ENABLING COMPETITION THROUGH STANDARDIZATION: INSIGHTS ON ADVERSARIAL STANDARD SETTING FROM THE EU’S INTEROPERABILITY REGULATION
Clicks: 9
ID: 322249
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
9 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #1 of 3 articles by views in JOURNAL OF COMPETITION LAW & ECONOMICS
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
ABSTRACT In an effort to increase competition in digital markets, both the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the Data Act (DA)—two landmark EU digital regulations—empower the European Commission to impose standards for the interoperability of digital services. In the case of the DMA, the Commission can, for instance, impose standards with respect to interoperability between messaging apps, and in the DA, standardization relates, for example, to interoperability between cloud services. In both cases, the European Commission can decide whether to delegate the standard setting to European Standardization Organizations (ESOs) or create its own standards. We note that standardization in that context differs from the contexts that ESOs have previously managed, because the adoption of the standard is not voluntary and firms have conflicting interests. Although an incumbent has a strong incentive to resist the emergence of a common standard, a rival firm would benefit from standardization—a scenario that we call ‘adversarial standard setting’. In that new context, we analyze the feasibility of the Commission’s possible approaches to standardization and compare their effectiveness in promoting competition and contestability in digital markets.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7170972003
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Leonie Ott, Marcin Roter, Jan Kraemer, Thomas Ackermann |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF COMPETITION LAW & ECONOMICS |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/joclec/nhag023
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.