Constructing a rehabilitation index to assess the relationship between prison environments and reoffending
Clicks: 3
ID: 322242
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
3 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #9 of 9 articles by views in The British Journal of Criminology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Correctional rehabilitation policy typically targets individual risk, with little attention to institutional risk. Using administrative data on 11,302 adult men released from 45 prisons in one Australian jurisdiction, we estimate multiple-membership multilevel logistic models that time-weight exposure across facilities and benchmark prisons with a risk-adjusted rehabilitation index. Prisons differed significantly in reimprisonment rates after adjusting for individual risk profiles. Contextual features and in-prison experiences were associated with outcomes. Including people’s in-prison experiences made the model better at distinguishing who returned to custody and explained much of the remaining difference between prisons. Findings challenge person-only explanations of reoffending and show that institutional context matters. The approach offers a learning-oriented model of prison accountability and points to practical ways to improve rehabilitative performance.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7170324093
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Jennifer Galouzis, Andrew Day, Stuart Ross, Denny Meyer, D. L. Johns |
| Journal | The British Journal of Criminology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/bjc/azag058
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.