Language, culture, and ethnicity data collection in pediatric healthcare in Canada: a national environmental scan

Clicks: 9
ID: 322089
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1 of 11 articles by views in paediatrics & child health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background and Objectives Canada's pediatric healthcare systems serve an increasingly ethnoculturally diverse population, yet the standardized collection of language, culture, and ethnicity (LCE) data remains inconsistent. Without reliable data, health systems cannot identify inequities, monitor disparities, or design targeted interventions. Our purpose was to examine current LCE data collection practices across pediatric healthcare settings in Canada and identify perceived barriers, enablers, and opportunities to strengthen equitable data infrastructure. Methods A cross-sectional environmental scan was conducted between January and February 2026 using an anonymous online survey of pediatric healthcare clinicians and staff across Canada. The survey included closed- and open-ended questions on LCE data collection practices, tools, effectiveness, data use, training, and organizational supports. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively; qualitative responses underwent inductive content analysis. Results A total of 237 participants from diverse pediatric settings completed the survey. Nearly 60% reported that their organization does not collect LCE data, and 56% were unsure of the effectiveness of existing practices. When collected, LCE data were primarily limited to preferred language and used to identify interpreter needs. Formal training and organizational policies were rare (both 3%). Perceived barriers included a lack of training, time constraints, and the absence of standardized tools. Qualitative findings highlighted strong conceptual support for LCE data collection but emphasized its conditional value, ethical complexity, and need for participatory approaches. Conclusion LCE data collection in Canadian pediatric healthcare remains fragmented and underutilized. Advancing equitable data infrastructure will require standardized protocols, targeted training, participatory co-design, and clear accountability for data use.
Reference Key
openalex_W7170049721 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Victor Do, Amanda S. Newton, Rebecca Gokiert, Geoff D.C. Ball
Journal paediatrics & child health
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/pch/pxag069
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.