Health System Responses to Homelessness in the United States: Prevalence and Predictors
Clicks: 2
ID: 321848
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
2 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #2 of 89 articles by views in Health Affairs Scholar
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Introduction 2024 marked the greatest number of Americans experiencing homelessness ever recorded. Health systems play a pivotal role in caring for unhoused populations, and reducing homelessness decreases healthcare costs and improves health outcomes. As homelessness increases, health systems face mounting pressure to address the social determinants of health, yet little is known about their responses to homelessness. Methods In 2024 we collected primary data from the 200 largest health systems websites to measure the prevalence of health system homeless mitigation programs, and systems-level factors predicting program presence. Results Over half (56%) of the 200 largest health systems have a homeless mitigation program. The most common program-types included affordable and permanent supportive housing, homeless outreach, and shelter medicine. Health systems located in Medicaid expansion states had more than twice the adjusted odds of having a homelessness mitigation program than those in non-expansion states (aOR 2.31; 95% CI, 1.11, 4.79). Health systems in states with greater shelter capacity were more likely to have a homeless mitigation program, with each additional shelter bed per 10 people experiencing homelessness associated with about 12% higher adjusted odds (aOR 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01, 1.24). Conclusion As federal spending for safety net programs – including homelessness, housing, and Medicaid – precipitously declines, health systems’ homeless mitigation programs may increasingly fill critical policy gaps.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7170051109
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Alisa Dewald, Naquia Unwala, Timothy B. Creedon, Phillip M. Singer, Charley E. Willison |
| Journal | Health Affairs Scholar |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/haschl/qxag188
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.