Local control by mediastinal lymph-node dissection in stage i non-small-cell lung cancer
Clicks: 5
ID: 321805
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.6
/100
5 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #1 of 82 articles by views in Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Mediastinal lymph-node dissection (MLND) is recommended for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, its prognostic impact remains controversial. We evaluated whether MLND improves prognosis in patients with radiologically solid-dominant clinical stage I NSCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2212 patients who underwent lobectomy for solid-dominant clinical stage I NSCLC between 2010 and 2022. Prognosis and local control were compared between the MLND and non-MLND groups. RESULTS: The MLND and non-MLND groups included 1912 and 300 patients, respectively. After propensity score matching, 5-year overall survival did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups (85.3% vs. 79.3%, P = 0.089). MLND identified occult pN2 metastasis in 7.3% (138/1912) of patients. Notably, 3.6% (68/1912) of the entire MLND cohort had pN2 disease yet remained recurrence-free. Furthermore, the MLND group demonstrated significantly lower mediastinal lymph-node recurrence than the non-MLND group (P = 0.017). Among patients with pN2 disease in the MLND group, those with recurrence (n = 70) had a higher incidence of intrapulmonary metastases (P = 0.042), a higher number of mediastinal lymph-node metastases (P = 0.002), and a lower rate of skip-N2 involvement (P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: MLND provides superior local control by reducing mediastinal recurrences and enables accurate pathological staging. While this advantage guides appropriate adjuvant therapy selection, the direct impact of MLND on overall survival remains uncertain. Its true survival benefit should be evaluated in future prospective randomised trials.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7169877334
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Shunsuke Morita, Takahiro Mimae, Yujin Kudo, Takuya Nagashima, Norifumi Tsubokawa, Y Miyata, Hiroyuki Ito, Norihiko Ikeda, Morihito Okada |
| Journal | Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/icvts/ivag189
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.