University expansion, academic fields, and the match between the degree and the job

Clicks: 5
ID: 321605
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #21 of 155 articles by views in social forces

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 155 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Academic knowledge—such as biology, psychology, and economics—is found both in university majors and specific occupations. When educational attainment expands in the population, does it improve or weaken the academic match between university majors and occupations? Using nationally representative data from Great Britain and Canada, we find heterogeneous effects by field of study that are consistent across countries. Increases in the proportion of individuals with university degrees improves matches for economics, mathematics, and fine arts majors, such that they enter occupations that utilize more of their major-specific academic knowledge. The reverse is true for graduates in philosophy and theology, sociology and anthropology, and several majors in the natural and physical sciences. While some high-status fields see stronger matches between major and occupation as education expands, the natural and physical sciences remain a clear exception. These idiosyncratic results suggest that field-level prestige partly explains the heterogeneous effects of educational expansion on major-occupation matching, but that more research is needed on shifts in academic knowledge usage in the labor market.
Reference Key
openalex_W7169776622 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jonathan Horowitz, Sagi Ramaj
Journal social forces
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/sf/soag096
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soag096
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.