Roadmap for systematic identification and analysis of multiple biases in causal inference

Clicks: 16
ID: 321585
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #41 of 311 articles by views in american journal of epidemiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 311 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Observational studies examining causal effects rely on unverifiable assumptions, the violation of which can induce multiple biases. Quantitative bias analysis (QBA) methods examine the sensitivity of findings to such violations, generally, by producing estimates under alternative assumptions, incorporating additional information. Although substantial guidance exists for implementing QBA, there is limited guidance on how to systematically determine the assumptions underlying a primary causal analysis and the potential violations that should guide bias analysis. Consequently, many assumptions remain implicit, leading to selective and therefore misleading QBA. To address this gap, we propose a roadmap for systematically identifying and analysing multiple biases. Briefly, this consists of (i) articulating the assumptions underlying the primary analysis through specification of the "ideal trial" that defines the causal estimand and the assumptions required by its (possibly implicit) emulation, depicting these assumptions using a causal diagram; (ii) extending the diagram to depict alternative assumptions, under which biases may arise; (iii) obtaining a single estimate that simultaneously corrects for all potential biases. We illustrate the roadmap using an investigation of the effect of breastfeeding on risk of childhood asthma, and through simulations demonstrate the need for analysing multiple biases jointly rather than one at a time.
Reference Key
openalex_W4414827968 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Rushani Wijesuriya, Rachael A. Hughes, John B. Carlin, Rachel L. Peters, Jennifer J. Koplin, Margarita Moreno‐Betancur
Journal american journal of epidemiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/aje/kwag166
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag166
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.