Ideology and the scope of judicial discretion: evidence from the federal district courts
Clicks: 12
ID: 321536
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
3.3
/100
12 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #12 of 21 articles by views in The Journal of Law Economics and Organization
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This study examines how changes in judicial discretion influence ideological decision-making in the federal courts. Leveraging a pair of unanimous Supreme Court decisions that expanded district judges’ discretion to award attorney’s fees in patent litigation, we investigate whether this procedural reform led to substantive shifts in outcomes. Our differences-in-differences design reveals that conservative judges became significantly more likely to award fees after 2014 while more liberal ones did not. We observe no similar pattern in copyright cases, which experienced no comparable expansion of discretion. This patent-specific effect is driven by accused infringers seeking fees after defeating patent claims, consistent with conservative preferences for deterring frivolous litigation. Even unanimous, procedurally focused appellate rulings can lead to asymmetric ideological effects. These findings have implications for understanding how changes in discretionary authority—including the Court’s recent abandonment of Chevron deference—may systematically empower certain ideological preferences in the federal judiciary.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7169671847
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Banks Miller, Brett Curry |
| Journal | The Journal of Law Economics and Organization |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jleo/ewag028
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.