Feminist Digital Humanities: Intersections in Practice. L. M. Rhody and S. Schreibman (Eds)
Clicks: 12
ID: 321251
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
3.3
/100
12 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #6 of 18 articles by views in digital scholarship in the humanities
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The ever-evolving technological innovations necessitate women’s participation in cyberspace not only as netizens but as active feminist technologists. Feminist Digital Humanities: Intersections in Practice underscores how digital humanities (DH) based pedagogies and methodologies are shaped by feminist practices. By challenging the prevalent inequities “DH offers rich terrain for feminists to interrogate and challenge existing hierarchies, exploring and implementing new practices through collaboration and care” (Rhody and Schreibman 2025, p. 4). The feminist DH practices promise a critical site of knowledge production through contesting marginalized forms of knowledge production. As the scholarship on feminist DH theory and practice is scanty, this book is an optimistic example of inspiring dynamic future research in DH through a revaluation of the marginalized forms of knowledge production. The editors do not connive at the multiplicity of definitions both feminism and DH are engaged with. Therefore, each chapter formulates its context with clarity and specificity. Also, based on the chapters’ context and debates, the authors define themselves as feminists, womanists, and liberalists which renders the anthology an inclusive approach by imbibing shared feminist values of care, affect, and labor. Similarly, some authors are meticulous not to label themselves as digital humanists but rather find meaning in being the representatives of the core values of DH which include but are not limited to critiquing, re/building, challenging, and subverting the structures of male privilege by highlighting the invisibility of women in the domain of DH.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7168605244
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ayesha Perveen |
| Journal | digital scholarship in the humanities |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/llc/fqag109
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.