The complexities of comprehensive exams in epidemiology

Clicks: 4
ID: 321201
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #237 of 307 articles by views in american journal of epidemiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 307 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Comprehensive exams are a standard component of doctoral-level training programs in epidemiology. In this manuscript, we describe current practices in the administration of comprehensive examinations across doctoral programs in epidemiology and discuss variation in the content, format, and structure of these exams. We present results from a survey about the comprehensive exam process at thirty-three different epidemiology programs. We also discuss a symposium focused on comprehensive exams that was part of the 2025 Society for Epidemiologic Research annual meeting. The symposium included speakers with specific expertise on designing comprehensive exams as well as faculty from several different epidemiology programs across North America.. The survey found important differences in format (ie, written, oral, general epidemiology, substantive topics), when the exams are administered, and what level of epidemiology knowledge they are targeting. In this manuscript, we also discuss common challenges programs face, including creating and grading the exams. By sharing this information with a wide audience of epidemiologists, we aim to facilitate discussion to improve the comprehensive exam process for doctoral students in our field. This work also fits with abroader goal to initiate discussion about doctoral-level training in epidemiology.
Reference Key
openalex_W7168987558 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Hailey R. Banack, Jay S. Kaufman, Jacqueline E McLaughlin, Michael B. Jarstfer, Lynne C. Messer, Matthew P Fox
Journal american journal of epidemiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/aje/kwag158
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag158
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.