Maternal and neonatal outcomes of vitamin D supplementation in hypovitaminosis D pregnancy: preg-D randomized trial

Clicks: 1
ID: 321185
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #349 of 359 articles by views in the journal of clinical endocrinology & metabolism

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 359 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Context Hypovitaminosis D during pregnancy is common and may have adverse maternal and neonatal effects. While randomized trials show that supplementation improves biochemical vitamin D status, the optimal dose and its effects on neonatal bone outcomes remain uncertain. Objective To compare the effects of 2 vitamin D supplementation doses during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) at delivery, and on neonatal bone mineral content. Methods In this double-blind trial, pregnant women ≤17.5 weeks' gestation with baseline 25(OH)D 10 to 30 ng/mL were randomized to receive either 20 000 IU/week or 10 000 IU every 2 weeks (equivalent to 714 IU/day) vitamin D3. Primary outcomes were the proportion of women achieving a 25(OH)D level ≥20 ng/mL at delivery and neonatal bone mineral content (BMC) at ∼1 month of age. We used liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (standard LC–MS/MS) at a CDC-certified laboratory. Results One hundred and ninety-two maternal neonatal pairs had complete biochemical data and 67 neonates had evaluable DXA scans. A significantly higher proportion (100%) of women and neonates (77%) in the higher dose group achieved 25(OH)D levels ≥20 ng/mL at delivery, compared with the lower dose group (85% and 40%, respectively, P = .001). Mean 25(OH)D in mothers and neonates at delivery followed a similar pattern (P = .001). However, neonatal subtotal whole-body BMC did not differ between groups (45.9 ± 8.5 vs 42.2 ± 7.1 g, respectively; P = .059), nor did neonatal bone mineral density or bone area. We did not identify any safety concerns related to supplementation. Conclusion Higher dose vitamin D supplementation safely achieved biochemical sufficiency in mothers and neonates without measurable effect on neonatal bone outcomes.
Reference Key
openalex_W7169421062 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Marlene Chakhtoura, Anwar H. Nassar, Sara Ajjour, Maya Rahme, Mariam Assaad, Mona Nabulsi, Lama Charafeddine, Ziyad Mahfoud, Nawal Tfaily, Taghrid Diab, Rihab Al-Tayeh, Ali Zeitoun, John Shepherd, Etienne Cavalier, Cyrus Cooper, Nicholas C. Harvey, Joe Eid, Myriam Chlela, Ghada El‐Hajj Fuleihan
Journal the journal of clinical endocrinology & metabolism
Year 2026
DOI
10.1210/clinem/dgag245
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.