Implications of workforce turnover in child protection social work: The ‘CARERS framework’ conceptualized by the voice of those with lived experience
Clicks: 12
ID: 321120
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
3.3
/100
12 views
3 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #7 of 18 articles by views in The British Journal of Social Work
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Social work is a population-level safeguarding system, intervening in situations of risk, neglect, and harm within children and families’ services. However, persistent workforce instability, including high levels of social worker turnover, continues to undermine service continuity, relationship-based practice, and safeguarding capacity. While organizational consequences of turnover are well documented, less is known about how these disruptions are experienced by service-users. This qualitative study centres the voices of care leavers, parents, and foster parents, alongside advocacy groups, to examine how social worker turnover is experienced. Drawing on eighteen in-depth interviews and three focus groups, the analysis introduces the CARERS framework, a thematic acronym capturing six inter-connected domains. Findings show that workforce instability was experienced as a relational and emotional loss and service disruption that fractures trust, delays decision-making, interrupts life-story work, and shifts risk onto families and third-sector organizations. Turnover emerges as a safeguarding concern rather than a single workforce issue. This paper argues that a systems-level perspective is needed to centre experiences of service recipients, which needs to be the focal point for systemic impact of workforce turnover. The absence of service-user perspectives within turnover research reinforces existing structural inequalities and epistemic injustice faced by children and families.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7168356303
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Justin MacLochlainn, Paula McFadden, Susan McGrory, Mary McColgan, Rachel Naylor, Emma McGinnis, Dominic McSherry, Gillian Martin, John Mallett |
| Journal | The British Journal of Social Work |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/bjsw/bcag114
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.