Parsing Middle High German: exploring cross-lingual NLP for treebank construction in low-resource historical languages

Clicks: 7
ID: 321054
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #10 of 18 articles by views in digital scholarship in the humanities

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Building syntactically annotated corpora, such as treebanks, for historical languages is a challenging yet vital task in digital humanities, as it underpins linguistic analysis and facilitates a range of interdisciplinary research. However, the scarcity of annotated data and the need for extensive expertise in historical linguistics make this process particularly demanding. In this study, we explore the potential of cross-lingual natural language processing (NLP) techniques as a semiautomatic solution for treebank construction in low-resource historical languages. We use Middle High German (MHG) as a case study. Leveraging the linguistic continuity and structural similarities between MHG and Modern German (MG), we effectively utilize the extensive MG treebank resources to develop a constituency parsing system tailored for MHG. Specifically, to design a semiautomatic system that integrates automatic annotation with manual validation, we explore two cross-lingual transfer techniques: zero-shot transfer and delexicalization; the latter removes lexical information to focus on syntactic structure. In our experiments, we first train parsers on MG treebanks, and then transfer them to MHG using the two cross-lingual transfer techniques. The delexicalization method achieves a parsing performance of 67.3 per cent in terms of F1-score. This performance significantly surpasses the zero-shot cross-lingual method by a margin of 28.6 percentage points. These investigations validate the effectiveness and feasibility of cross-lingual transfer techniques for historical language treebank construction. This study highlights the potential of NLP tools to streamline the semiautomatic annotation process, reducing the reliance on extensive linguistic expertise and manual effort, and paving the way for broader applications in digital humanities research.
Reference Key
openalex_W7168424801 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ercong Nie, Siyao Peng, Helmut Schmid, Hinrich Schütze
Journal digital scholarship in the humanities
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/llc/fqag104
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.