Geopolitical Integration vs. fragmentation: the economic geography of disparities in Europe

Clicks: 12
ID: 320931
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #18 of 27 articles by views in journal of economic geography

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Rising geopolitical tensions and emerging skepticism against globalization cast doubt on the future evolution of European regional economic growth. We simulate regional GDP growth rates for all NUTS2 regions in the EU27+UK for the period 2021–2035, using the MASST5 model, in two extreme scenarios; the first, termed “Cohesive EU in an Integrated World”; the second, labeled “Nationalistic EU in a Fragmented World”. Results document substantial spatial heterogeneity in the outcomes of the two scenarios, with Integration leading to superior economic performance but at the cost of increasing regional disparities triggered by higher growth opportunities for national champions.
Reference Key
openalex_W7168260933 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Roberta Capello, Andrea Caragliu, Roberto Dellisanti
Journal journal of economic geography
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jeg/lbag046
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.