Substantive Convergence and Institutional Divergence: The Regulation of Subsidies in the UK
Clicks: 9
ID: 320410
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
2.4
/100
9 views
4 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #2 of 4 articles by views in oxford journal of legal studies
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The UK Subsidy Control Act 2022 is not fundamentally different, as far as its substantive provisions are concerned, from the EU state aid regime. Its institutional setup, on the other hand, departs significantly from that underpinning its EU counterpart. The article discusses how this factor—together with the impact it may have on the powers and incentives of the various actors in the system—has influenced, and is likely to influence, the substantive evolution of the UK regime over time. The analysis considers the administrative practice of the Competition and Markets Authority and the emerging case law of the Competition Appeal Tribunal.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7165048260
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Pablo Ibáñez Colomo |
| Journal | oxford journal of legal studies |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/ojls/gqag022
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.