Recommendations for transitioning diabetes, epilepsy, and ADHD youth. The TransiDEA Project

Clicks: 7
ID: 320401
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #10 of 11 articles by views in paediatrics & child health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Introduction The transition from pediatric to adult health care is a critical yet often challenging process for young adults with chronic conditions, marked by fragmented communication, scarce resources, and a lack of standardized guidelines. The Italian TransiDEA project aimed to address these gaps by developing tailored transition recommendations for three clinical populations: young adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Type 1 diabetes (T1D), or epilepsy. Methods Using a Delphi consensus method, three multidisciplinary panels including clinicians, young adults, caregivers, and association members were conducted in parallel, each addressing one of the three clinical targets. Participants assessed and revised the transition guidelines adapted from international frameworks over two rounds of evaluation. Results After the first round, the overall agreement was above 75% for all three chronic conditions. The changes made to the statements based on the ratings and suggestions, led to high agreement (100%) in the second round. Discussion The final recommendations share key elements, including early transition planning (starting around age 16), the assignment of a named transition worker, and using standardized tools (e.g., transition readiness questionnaires). Condition-specific adaptations addressed unique needs, such as psychological support in ADHD, tailoring the process on a case-by-case basis depending on the clinical picture in epilepsy, and extended transition timelines (up to age 22) in T1D. Conclusion The TransiDEA project demonstrates the feasibility of structured yet flexible recommendations for transition pathways across chronic conditions, while encouraging systemic improvements to enhance care continuity. Despite these advances, challenges remain, including the need for future validation of the guidelines and tools and increased resource and institutional support to ensure equitable access.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167918829 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Elisa Roberti, Antonio Clavenna, Vanna Graziani, Federico Marchetti, Tosca Suprani, Paolo Di Bartolo, Maria Paola Canevini, Ilaria Viganò, Emilia Ricci, Ilaria Costantino, Valeria Tessarollo, Eleonora Basso, Francesca Scarpellini, Rita Campi, Michele Giardino, Michele Zanetti, Maurizio Bonati
Journal paediatrics & child health
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/pch/pxag068
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.