Fold or flop: quality assessment of AlphaFold predictions on whole proteomes

Clicks: 1
ID: 320383
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #31 of 97 articles by views in Bioinformatics advances

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Motivation Reliability of AlphaFold2 predictions is mainly assessed using the predicted Local Distance Difference Test (pLDDT). For model organisms, 30–40% of residues fall into the low-confidence pLDDT range. Moreover, pLDDT sometimes fails to flag physically implausible structures. This raises two questions: can more robust reliability indicators be identified, and do unreliable predictions share common structural or biophysical features? Results We characterize protein structures through histograms of per-residue neighbor counts, and use the Wasserstein principal component analysis to define the arity map, and lightweight and informative 2D embedding of proteins in a dataset. Using AlphaFold-DB, we show that the arity map reveals three structurally and biophysically distinct populations (well-folded proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins, and physically implausible predictions). We also use our packing based encoding at the residue level to define abstraqt (Arity-Based STRuctural Arrangement Quality assessmenT), a per-residue scoring function complementing the pLDDT, assigning low scores to hallucinated helices and distorted beta strands while correctly scoring native like predictions. Availability The code to compute arity maps and rerun the analyses is available within the Structural Bioinformatics Library. See: AlphaFold analysis, and also Documentation, Applications, Installation guide. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Advances online.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167808408 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Edoardo Sarti, Frédéric Cazals
Journal Bioinformatics advances
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bioadv/vbag190
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.