Effects of combined high-intensity inspiratory muscle training and aerobic exercise in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clicks: 1
ID: 320301
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #180 of 192 articles by views in european journal of preventive cardiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 192 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
AIMS: Inspiratory muscle training (ΙμΤ) with high loads, an adjuvant exercise modality in cardiac rehabilitation programs, seems beneficial for patients with heart failure (HF). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the effects of combined high ΙμΤ (H-IMT) and aerobic exercise (AE) training in patients with HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted across Medline (via EBSCOhost), PEDro, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science up to 15 July 2025, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2) and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach were used to assess the methodological quality and overall evidence quality, respectively. A narrative synthesis of findings was completed, and meta-analysis was conducted on clinical outcomes when data were available from at least two studies. Seven RCTs were included, with female participants comprising 33% of the total sample. Interventions lasted from 6 to 16 weeks in hospital or home settings. Adding H-IMT elicits extra benefits in maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) (MD = 15.24 cm H2O, 95% CI 7.30 to 23.17, P = 0.0002), quality of life (QoL) (MD = -6.96 units, 95% CI -11.33 to -2.59, P = 0.002) compared with AE training. No extra benefit was reported in pulmonary indices, left ventricular ejection fraction, aerobic and functional capacity. Still, most studies (4 out of 7) had a considerable risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Combined H-IMT and AE training may improve MIP and QoL in patients with HF. However, these findings are preliminary and based on very low-quality evidence. Larger, high-quality trials are needed to confirm benefits before broad clinical implementation. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number is CRD42024568200.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167840691 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Maria Isakoglou, Vaia Sapouna, M. Andriopoulou, Evdokia Billis, Gerasimos Filippatos, Eleni Kortianou
Journal european journal of preventive cardiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/eurjpc/zwag328
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.