Transformer-based models for predicting cardiovascular risk in Chinese adults: development and validation

Clicks: 29
ID: 320233
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #68 of 379 articles by views in european heart journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 379 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background and Aims Traditional Cox proportional hazards models show suboptimal performance for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction in Chinese populations. Transformer-based deep learning models have demonstrated promise in clinical risk prediction. In this study, sex-specific transformer-based models (China-AIHeart) for 10-year CVD risk prediction among Chinese adults were developed and validated. Methods The derivation cohort included 156 790 participants [34.6% men; mean [SD] age, 56.7 [8.9] years) without CVD from the China Cardiometabolic Disease and Cancer Cohort. External validation was conducted in two independent Chinese cohorts (Xinjiang and CHARLS). Transformer-based time-to-event prediction models were developed, including a full model (22 predictors) and a simplified model (15 predictors). Performance was compared with Cox models using identical predictors and established risk scores (China-PAR, PREVENT-ASCVD, and SCORE2 Asia-Pacific equations). Results China-AIHeart demonstrated good discrimination (C-statistic [95% confidence interval, CI]: .767 [.754–.779] in men; .780 [.769–.791] in women), calibration (calibration χ2: 14.806 in men; 9.326 in women; Brier score: .104 in men; .077 in women), and net clinical benefit in predicting CVD risk. Predicted event rates closely matched observed risks across strata. Compared with Cox models with identical predictors, China-AIHeart showed improved discrimination (ΔC-statistic [95% CI]: .027 [.025–.028] in men; .031 [.029–.033] in women) and reclassification (net reclassification index [95% CI]: .478 [.466–.492] in men; .560 [.551–.572] in women), and outperformed China-PAR, PREVENT-ASCVD, and SCORE2 Asia-Pacific equations. External validation demonstrated robust performance, with C-statistics of .781/.825 (men/women) and .748/.820 for the full and simplified models in the Xinjiang cohort, and .740/.771 for the simplified model in the CHARLS cohort. Conclusions The transformer-based China-AIHeart models predicted 10-year CVD risk and outperformed traditional Cox-based approaches, providing a practical tool for risk stratification in Chinese adults.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167801871 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal european heart journal
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/eurheartj/ehag517
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.