Birth certificate measures of maternal morbidity and their limits in abortion policy research

Clicks: 1
ID: 320221
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #292 of 302 articles by views in american journal of epidemiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 302 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Three indicators of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) available in US birth certificate data are increasingly used in research, yet prior studies suggest they are poorly ascertained. It is unclear whether low validity of these data threatens causal inference in evaluations of policies or shocks that vary across states and over time, including abortion bans enacted after the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision. Using birth certificate and hospital discharge data from 12 states (2018-2021), we assessed data quality for three SMM indicators (hysterectomy, blood transfusion, and eclampsia) and a composite measure and compared state-year trends across six states that subsequently imposed abortion bans shortly after the Dobbs decision and six that did not, including tests of the parallel trends assumption. Compared with hospitalization data, birth certificates under-ascertained hysterectomy, blood transfusion, and the composite measure while over-ascertaining eclampsia. Composite SMM rates appeared higher in abortion-ban states using birth certificate data but were similar or lower in hospitalization data. Over time, birth certificate ascertainment improved in states with bans but remained flat elsewhere, potentially introducing data artifacts. Violations of the parallel trends assumption were detected in hospitalization but not birth certificate data. Reliance on birth certificate data for policy evaluation can produce erroneous inferences.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167810650 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Suzanne O. Bell, Selena Anjur-Dietrich, Alison Gemmill
Journal american journal of epidemiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/aje/kwag159
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag159
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.