Pharyngeal gonorrhea in Ugandan men with urogenital gonorrhea: differences in antimicrobial resistance and strain types between anatomical sites

Clicks: 3
ID: 320173
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #378 of 432 articles by views in The Journal of infectious diseases

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 432 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae (phNG) infections are difficult to treat and contribute to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in NG, but studies on phNG and differences with urogenital NG (uNG) are limited. METHODS: Participants with urethral discharge syndrome (UDS) were recruited at health clinics in Kampala, Uganda, between July 2020 and August 2023. Penile-meatal and pharyngeal swabs were cultured for NG and tested by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for NG, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Mycoplasma genitalium. Paired uNG and phNG isolates were subjected to susceptibility testing and whole genome sequencing (WGS). Demographic and behavioral data were analyzed for correlates of uNG and phNG. RESULTS: The participants' (n=411) median [IQR] age was 25 [22, 32] years; 16.7% (67/401) were living with HIV. By NAAT and/or culture, 273 (66.4%) participants were positive for uNG and 29 (7.1%) for phNG. Of those with uNG, 10.6% (29/273) were NAAT-positive for phNG; 69.0% (20/29) were culture-positive for phNG. All (n=40) NG isolates were susceptible to cefixime and ceftriaxone and displayed intermediate resistance/resistance to ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline; eight displayed high-level azithromycin resistance. WGS showed that 52.6% (10/19) of participants had different strains at urethral and pharyngeal sites. Having different strains at two anatomical sites was more common in men self-reporting transactional sex (p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: phNG is common in Ugandan men with uNG, both displaying high rates of AMR. Different strains at the two anatomical sites were common, supporting the need for pharyngeal testing and phNG susceptibility testing as the pharynx is a critical site for AMR emergence.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167724599 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Johan H. Melendez, Annet Onzia, Emmanuel Mande, Adamaris Muñiz Tirado, B Dawa, Yu‐Hsiang Hsieh, Matthew M. Hamill, Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi, Hervé Tettelin, Yukari C. Manabe
Journal The Journal of infectious diseases
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/infdis/jiag353
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.