Later life social interactions in community spaces

Clicks: 1
ID: 320059
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #41 of 155 articles by views in social forces

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 155 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Daily social interactions provide access to key social resources, yet little research has examined how these interactions vary across geographic space—particularly in later life. Using ecological momentary assessment data from a state-representative study of older adults in Indiana, we examine how interactions with different partners vary across a continuum of municipality population density. Further, we assess whether this variation is shaped by social opportunity structures—such as number of community parks, theaters, and volunteer organizations—and whether patterns persist during leisure time, when individuals are free to choose their interaction partners. Results show that higher population density is associated with more time spent alone, more interactions with “shared-foci partners” (i.e., partners known through foci of activity, such as neighbors, professionals, congregation members—though associations are driven primarily by professionals, strangers, and “others”), and fewer interactions with kin. Adjusting for social opportunity structures does not affect the observed association between population density and aloneness, interactions with shared-foci partners, or interactions with kin, indicating that differential access to social opportunity spaces does not explain these relationships. Restricting analyses to leisure activities reveals that differences in shared-foci partner interactions by population density disappear—implying they are driven by variation in obligatory tasks—while differences in kin interactions and, to a lesser extent, time spent alone persist. By identifying population density as a structural factor that shapes everyday sociality, this study underscores the role of geographic context in structuring older adults’ access to social connection and the resources embedded in daily interaction.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167577324 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Maleah Fekete, Tianyao Qu, Brea L. Perry, Siyun Peng, Adam R. Roth
Journal social forces
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/sf/soag088
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soag088
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.