Reviewing the Safety of Providing Out of Operating Room Anesthesia for Acute Burns in Pediatric Patients

Clicks: 6
ID: 320016
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Pain management is a cornerstone of acute pediatric burn care, and burn wound care frequently requires sedation or anesthesia to optimize patient comfort and procedural success. Anesthesia delivered outside of the operating room (OR) has been shown to be a safe and effective alternative to OR-based care; however, eligibility has traditionally been restricted to older and larger children. Following a quality care audit in 2022, eligibility for anesthesiologist-administered out-of-OR anesthesia at our tertiary pediatric burn center was expanded to include children aged 8-12 months and/or weighing 8-10 kg. The objective of this study was to compare key quality and safety indicators between patients meeting expanded eligibility criteria and those meeting historical criteria (>10 kg and/or 12-24 months) undergoing burn dressing changes in a general anesthesia-ready satellite anesthesia room. This single-center retrospective study included patients treated between January 2022 and January 2024. Outcomes included procedure duration, anesthetic technique, airway management, anesthesia-related complications, and post-procedure disposition. A total of 211 patients undergoing 296 procedures were included. Burn characteristics were similar between groups, with scald injuries and partial-thickness burns predominating. No episodes of oxygen desaturation, hemodynamic instability, airway obstruction, or difficult mask ventilation were observed. One episode of laryngospasm occurred in the expanded group and resolved with conservative airway management. Procedure duration was shorter, while time to discharge was slightly longer, in the expanded group. These findings suggest that expanding eligibility criteria for out-of-OR anesthesia in pediatric burn patients is safe and feasible and does not compromise procedural efficiency or outcomes.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167663810 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sabrina Yang, Sara Faour, Farrukh Munshey, Tobias Everett, Charis Kelly, Eduardo Gus, Joel Fish
Journal journal of burn care & research : official publication of the american burn association
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jbcr/irag118
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.