The rise of reasonableness in enforcement
Clicks: 10
ID: 319981
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
2.7
/100
10 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #2 of 8 articles by views in uniform law review
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This article examines the increasing reliance in international commercial law instruments on open standards such as commercial reasonableness and good faith in the context of the enforcement of secured transactions. Whereas limiting the role of independent third parties (such as courts or experts) in enforcement may have advantages in certain settings, the reliance on open standards may be detrimental where weaker economic actors are involved. Moreover, international law instruments apply reasonableness, good faith and comparable standards in a variety of ways. This calls for a more balanced approach.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7167737022
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas Keijser |
| Journal | uniform law review |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/ulr/unag019
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.