The rise of reasonableness in enforcement

Clicks: 10
ID: 319981
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #2 of 8 articles by views in uniform law review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This article examines the increasing reliance in international commercial law instruments on open standards such as commercial reasonableness and good faith in the context of the enforcement of secured transactions. Whereas limiting the role of independent third parties (such as courts or experts) in enforcement may have advantages in certain settings, the reliance on open standards may be detrimental where weaker economic actors are involved. Moreover, international law instruments apply reasonableness, good faith and comparable standards in a variety of ways. This calls for a more balanced approach.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167737022 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Thomas Keijser
Journal uniform law review
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ulr/unag019
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.