The rhetoric of dynasticism in the mid-fourth century
Clicks: 4
ID: 319901
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
0.9
/100
4 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #12 of 16 articles by views in bulletin of the institute of classical studies
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article investigates the role of panegyric in both shaping and responding to the shifting discourse on dynasticism in the mid-fourth century. It charts how a genre that was inherently focused on the present was forced to take a more capacious view of family connections, and how it adapted to the expansion and contraction of hereditary and collegiate models of legitimacy from the Tetrarchy to the end of the House of Constantine. It draws on speeches composed in both the East and West, and in Greek and Latin.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7167671235
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Alan J Ross |
| Journal | bulletin of the institute of classical studies |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/bics/qbag029
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.