Over-the-counter emergency contraceptive sales before and after Dobbs : a difference-in-difference analysis of US retail data

Clicks: 1
ID: 319873
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #80 of 90 articles by views in Health Affairs Scholar

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Introduction The US Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs) substantially altered abortion access nationwide, underscoring the importance of emergency contraception as the last opportunity to prevent an unwanted pregnancy. Methods We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study of over-the-counter (OTC) emergency contraceptive (EC) sales from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2022, comparing states that enacted a total or 6-week abortion ban after Dobbs with those with no new abortion restrictions. Weekly OTC sales per 1000 females aged 15–44 years were analyzed using a synthetic difference-in-differences and event study specification. Results In 2022, approximately 14.8 million units of EC were sold OTC, equivalent to 228 units per 1000 individuals at risk of pregnancy. Following Dobbs, OTC EC sales increased for 4 weeks, with larger short-term increases in states enacting more restrictive abortion policies. In the longer post-Dobbs period, we did not find significant sustained differences in sales (Average Treatment Effect on the Treated, ATT = −0.143, P =0.084; 95% CI: −0.31 to 0.02). Conclusion Future work is needed to understand how individuals adapt their reproductive health care decisions, including use of emergency contraception, under restrictive abortion policies.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167486072 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Alice Abernathy, Brandon Wagner, Kelly Cleland
Journal Health Affairs Scholar
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/haschl/qxag157
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag157
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.