The Missing Conversation in Burn Care: Intimacy & Sexuality
Clicks: 4
ID: 319826
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
0.9
/100
4 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #31 of 70 articles by views in journal of burn care & research : official publication of the american burn association
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Intimacy and sexuality are essential components of quality of life after burn injury, yet they remain overlooked in burn survivorship care. Evidence demonstrates lasting declines in sexual satisfaction and relational well-being among burn survivors but discussions about these concerns are rarely initiated by providers and standardized approaches remain absent. Surveys of burn care professionals reveal widespread discomfort in addressing sexual health, despite consensus that patients should not be expected to initiate these conversations. In contrast, other specialties, including oncology and cardiology, have recognized sexual health as a core component of survivorship and have implemented structured screening tools, counseling pathways, and multidisciplinary models of care. Burn survivors face distinct challenges that extend beyond physiologic sexual function, including altered body image, visible scarring, psychological recovery, and changes in relational confidence and closeness. These factors underscore the need to expand burn rehabilitation to include both sexual health and broader intimacy concerns. This commentary urges development of provider education and accessible clinical resources to support these conversations throughout the continuum of burn care. By intentionally integrating these elements into care models, the burn community can move beyond survival alone and advocate for recovery that restores connection, identity, and the possibility of fulfilling intimate lives.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7167509152
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Athena Hoppe, Cindy Rutter, Rebekah R Allely, Jeffrey E Carter, Jeffrey W. Shupp, M Victoria P Miles |
| Journal | journal of burn care & research : official publication of the american burn association |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jbcr/irag112
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.