White Phosphorus Burns: A Comprehensive Review over a Century of Evidence from “Willie Peter” to Modern Clinical Management

Clicks: 3
ID: 319646
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #72 of 75 articles by views in journal of burn care & research : official publication of the american burn association

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract White phosphorus (WP) is a highly reactive incendiary agent capable of causing severe injuries through combined thermal combustion and chemical tissue damage, with potential systemic toxicity disproportionate to burn size. Although traditionally associated with warfare, accidental civilian exposures continue to occur, including in coastal environments where historical military residues may persist. This narrative review synthesizes over a century of evidence on WP burns, integrating findings from experimental studies, clinical reports, military experiences, environmental investigations, and toxicological analyses. A contemporary civilian case of accidental coastal exposure is included to illustrate ongoing non-combat relevance. Available evidence consistently identifies hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, cardiac arrhythmias, renal injury, and hepatocellular damage as major systemic complications of WP exposure. Clinical reports show that retained particles may continue to oxidize and reignite upon oxygen exposure, requiring prompt decontamination, mechanical removal, metabolic monitoring, and repeated evaluation for residual material. Current evidence supports copious irrigation, oxygen exclusion with moist dressings, careful debridement, and avoidance of copper sulfate because of its systemic toxicity. The presented case highlights that even limited exposure may result in full-thickness burns requiring close observation despite minimal TBSA involvement. Despite over a century of reported experience, evidence guiding WP burn management remains fragmented and largely based on case reports and observational studies. The findings underscore the need for standardized clinical protocols, improved preventive strategies, and collaborative civilian–military approaches to advance recognition and management of this uncommon but potentially life-threatening injury.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167353518 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Paolo Marchica, Luciano Mangiameli, Giuseppe A G Lombardo
Journal journal of burn care & research : official publication of the american burn association
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jbcr/irag114
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag114
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.